Next: Results
Up: Localization of transcranial magnetic
Previous: Localization of transcranial magnetic
The experimental setting used in our method is illustrated at
figure
. It is based on a Isotrack 3D
localization device. It uses two probes, "p" and "h", whose
location and orientation relatively to the base station "b" is
known at all times. Probe "h" is attached to the forehead of the
patient and provides a local coordinate system for the head. Probe
"p" is first used to digitize the scalp surface for the
registration, then to localize the magnet during the stimulation.
Figure 7.2:
Experimental
setting.
 |
The first step of the registration process is the segmentation of
the scalp from the MR image. For this, the image is thresholded
and median-filtered. Then, the background of the image is found as
the largest connected component below the threshold level. The
scalp is the edge of the background.
Figure 7.3:
Matching criterion as a function of the translation or
rotation errors.
 |
The surface of the head in the physical space is defined as the
set S of points p digitized by the "p" probe and transformed
into the "h" coordinate system. The registration matching
criterion is defined as the mean square distance between this set
of points and the MRI-derived scalp surface O. Hence, the best
transformation T from the set
of rigid transformations is
 |
(7.1) |
In this equation,
distE(q,O) is of course pre-computed using a
3D Euclidean distance transformation. Because T(p) is not
necessarily located on the integer grid, the value of
distE(T(p),O) is tri-linearly interpolated from the distance
map.
Figure
studies the evolution of the matching
criterion's value as a function of the mis-registration. It is a
smooth function of the transformation parameters, so that we use a
simple gradient-based minimization algorithm to find the optimal
translation and rotation parameters.
Next: Results
Up: Localization of transcranial magnetic
Previous: Localization of transcranial magnetic
Olivier Cuisenaire
1999-10-05